What Scientific American is doing is a disgrace. When the last shreds of its credibility disappear and its readership inevitably declines, it will have only itself to blame.

As trust in major institutions declines, people are increasingly persuaded to vote by those in their social networks.

Scientific American urged readers to "Vote for Kamala Harris to Support Science, Health and the Environment." It's a ...

Conservative voters have slightly larger amygdalas than progressive voters—by about the size of a sesame seed. In a ...

“The debate quickly spiraled out of control for the former president,” Davis told APR.

Donald Trump pushed false claims and distorted facts as he tried to inflame fears about inflation, crime and immigration at a ...

Presidential debates have grabbed headlines in recent months, but one K-State professor says they don't tend to swing elections as much as people thing they do.

Many of the medical students heading back to class this month are taking courses that focus more on social justice and ...

The research by Alejandra Campos, assistant professor of political science and Latino studies, examines implementation of voter ID laws and their effects on the United States' voting and legislative ...

Bureau of Land Management just revealed an ambitious plan for renewable energy. So why are environmentalists upset?

Each of the trusted, regulated operators in this guide is backed by our Covers BetSmart Rating evaluation. Most political betting sites will reward new bettors with deposit match welcome bonuses ...